| Russian Academy of Sciences Centre for Egyptological Studies, Moscow (CESRAS) & Russian Institute of Egyptology in Cairo (RIEC) Research on the Funerary Art of the 21a Theban Dynasty of Payanch and Personages of that Period (1070-945 BCE) G. Maspero in ZÄS 21, 1883, p.70 seq.: Comments on the coffins of Nesychonsw and Isetemcheb D Site Directory Personages Artifacts Iconography Coffins Directory Royal Cache TT320 Network Index |
Maspero's text is in the public domain without restrictions, CESRAS commentary and photographs are the intellectual property of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Centre for
Egyptological Studies, Moscow R.F. This material may be freely used for non-commercial, educational, and public services applications. If you use our material, please give a credit to
CESRAS, Moscow, and make a link to http://www.cesras.org. You may contact us by email: admin@cesras.org and we would be happy to help you in any way we can. Thanks for your visit
to this site and please do come again. There will always be something new!
Egyptological Studies, Moscow R.F. This material may be freely used for non-commercial, educational, and public services applications. If you use our material, please give a credit to
CESRAS, Moscow, and make a link to http://www.cesras.org. You may contact us by email: admin@cesras.org and we would be happy to help you in any way we can. Thanks for your visit
to this site and please do come again. There will always be something new!
1/5
This paper is published here as an historical document from the early days of Egyptology. It contains
much obviously incorrect data, but discusses a subject still of actual debate. Read it out of interest for
the history of our science only. These are the words of a learned researcher who was there.
erl/CESRAS/2012
much obviously incorrect data, but discusses a subject still of actual debate. Read it out of interest for
the history of our science only. These are the words of a learned researcher who was there.
erl/CESRAS/2012
CORRECT
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
_________
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
.................
_________
years
Pinodjem as HPA
was considered as
Pinodjem 1. King
Khakheperre was
thought to be
Pinodjem 2. Thus,
Pinodjem II was
numbered 3
was considered as
Pinodjem 1. King
Khakheperre was
thought to be
Pinodjem 2. Thus,
Pinodjem II was
numbered 3
??